I dont personally use any gpl or lgpl source code because i dont like the requirements, but its nice to know theres a way to workaround supplying your source code when you want to statically link lgpl code. Specifically, unlike most weak copyleft licenses, which allow oss files to be linked statically that is, directly copied into the otherwise proprietary software, in order to avoid tainting proprietary software under the lgpl, the lgpllicensed oss libraries must be dynamically linked with the proprietary software that is, externally linked. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a free software license published by the free software foundation fsf. This license, the lesser general public license, applies to some specially designated software packagestypically librariesof the free software foundation and other authors who decide to use it. The gpl, lgpl, and mozilla licenses understanding open. Aug 28, 2014 the restrictions of including unedited lgpl software in your product are fairly simple and can be somewhat oversimplistically summarized as.
So, this post is to provide links to statically linked lgpl v3 ffmpeg executables for both 32. Distribute your application with the commercially licensed qt libraries, or 2. Youve already got the answer that lgpl libraries can be used in commercial software. Or to meet lgpl requirements should both libraries be distributed separately. Can i statically link the code with linux libraries. Jul 15, 2015 the presentation made during the webinar on software licensing and open source software on 15 july 2015 organised by nasscom. What does it mean to combine proprietary software with a gpl or lgpl software component. Open source software rules for startups, part ii lot.
Jun 14, 2016 applications that only use the library do not need to be distributed in accordance to lgpl see derivative work. This is a special instance of distributed software. As a specialist in internet security and pioneer in the field of virus protection, the company, founded in bochum in 1985, developed the first antivirus program more than 30 years ago. It grants end users the freedom to use, study, copy and modify a piece of software.
Legal repercussions of open source software licensing the. To understand the difference between gpl and lgpl you have to understand the basic idea of open source software. You cannot freely statically link nonfree code to lgpl code. But contrary to gpl, programs linked against a library under the lgpl do not need to be released under the lgpl and can be kept proprietary. Gpl software that executes 100% in its own process with no other linked code, lgpl software used only as a dynamically linked library, and. Lgpllicensed libraries can be linked with nongpl licensed programs, including proprietary software. Founded in 2010, lynx analytics is the brainchild of a group of insead students and professors. For the purpose of complying with the lgpl any extant version. So it does sound like providing object files is enough to satisfy lgpl in terms of statically linking a lgpl library to a proprietary code application.
Dell proprietary software is a work that uses the library as defined in gnu lesser general public license, and is provided as is without warranty of any kind expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. You can freely use qt under an lgpl license to create proprietary applications that dynamically link to the qt libraries. Can i use an lgpllicenced library in my commercial app. Open source 2 software is a part of the software ecosystem that affords software developers and users an alternative style of software development and distribution. Keep in mind, however, that the lgpl related requirements kick in only when you start distributing your software outside of your school, lab, or company. I kept a number of notes during these conversations and felt it was probably something that should be shared since, no matter how comfortable you are. Besides the lgpl license for pyside2, youll have to make sure that you comply with the qt licensing terms. The lgpl provides an alternative license that preserves many of the benefits of the gpl model for such librariesin fact, the lesser general public license was in its first incarnation known as the library general public license. Open source, dynamic linking and licensing consideration for. We live in a massively connected world with new lines of connections rapidly forming every millisecond. Lgpl library is linked statically to other lgpl library. Software engineering stack exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle. It seems cross compiling ffmpeg for lgpl v3 license i.
My own experience shows that dynamic linking is too much to bear. If you are statically linking the lgpl library then you need to provide the. Keep in mind, however, that the lgplrelated requirements kick in only when you start distributing your software outside of your school, lab, or company. If you are statically linking against lgpl software, however, you must also provide your recipient with the object code of your application before it was linked so that she can substitute the lgpl software. As long the application is linked dynamically to lgpl software, the proprietary code can be kept proprietary.
The company serves the production, midstream and finished products end markets. Nov 30, 2009 the lgpl is a copyleft open source software license that is less restrictive than the gpl gnu general public license what does this mean for you. An update to the fsfs list of free software licenses lists the new apache license, version 2. You will also need to provide the information that a software engineer would need to do the relinking. Artifex alleges that palm has copied artifexs pdf rendering engine, called mupdf, and integrated it into the palm pres pdf viewer application without the. The lgpl is a copyleft licence like the gpl, but with a more subtle effect. Note that when you distribute a proprietary application that is linked against lgpl software, you must allow for this lgpl software to be replaced. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components. The lesser general public license is sometimes described as a weak copyleft license, because code licensed under lgpls terms can be combined with code under nonfree licenses, and is.
The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a freesoftware license published by the free software foundation fsf. The gnu lesser general public license gnu lgpl was designed as a solution for such situations. Is it ok distribute both libraries as single shared library. This can also be met by distibuting statically linked binaries and all. Static systems group is an established specialist in the design, manufacture, installation, project management and maintenance of communication and fire detection systems for healthcare. See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work. According to lgpl library1 is distributed separately as shared library. You should have received a copy of the gnu lesser general public license along with this library. Apr 25, 2014 the gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is the most widely used free software license. Does it mean only literally grafting it in or static linking when the. And with this, newer and more relevant data that can either make or break businesses. The free software foundation fsf produced lgpl for libraries. Anything statically linked to the library can only be redistributed under lgpl, but applications that use the library.
Difference between gpl and lgpl difference between. However, because my software is not in the public domain, or under a bsdstyle free license, there are certain requirements. The free software foundation may publish revised andor new versions of the library general public license from time to time. Track in fossa gnu lesser general public license v2. Derivatives works including modifications or anything statically linked to the library can only be redistributed under lgpl, but applications that use the library dont have.
Top 9 gpl with the classpath exception questions answered. Lgps central limited manages the pooled assets of eight midlandsbased local. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is the most widely used free software license. Tingnan kung sino ang kakilala mo sa sophos, ileverage ang iyong propesyonal na network, at makapasok sa trabaho. The only requirement is that the enduser can recreate the end result by modifying the lgpl part. The lgpl does not require you to distribute the source code of your proprietary software that is linked dynamically with the lgpl code. When, for example, the software was only for internal use in the. Yes, glibc is licensed under the lgpl which is compatible with nonfree software. Lgpl is used in many libraries, including the c libraries and ffmpeg. We use your linkedin profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. Derivative works including modifications or anything statically linked to the library can only be distributed via lgpl. Open source, dynamic linking and licensing consideration. Is there a modified lgpl license that allows static linking.
The lesser general public license is sometimes described as a weak copyleft license, because code licensed under lgpls terms can be combined with code under nonfree licenses, and is sometimes used in that fashion. The lgpl has certain requirements requiring a modified version of the library because that is what it was designed for, libraries to be linkable against the. Yes, but any derivative software must be released under a lgpl license and allow reverse engineering for client modifications and debugging. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. Dynamically the application to the lgpllicensed qt libraries this. The company combines isocertified labs throughout north america, verifiable test methods, and worldrenowned scientists with patented software and digital workflows to bring assurance and insights to our customers data throughout the energy value chain. Is there a difference between licensing a library under the. You can use it too, but we suggest you first think carefully about whether this license or the ordinary general public license is the better. A primer on open source software for business people and. Sony rootkit allegedly contains lgpl software slashdot. Wasnt lgpl introduced so that the proprietary software can use the free library features instead. The gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries.
If linked statically, the application code must be released also as lgpl or everything that allows the user to relink the application with a different version of the lgpl source code, have to be provided. Gpl is basically the legal terminology that makes open source software what it is. Legal repercussions of open source software licensing. A primer on open source software for business people and lawyers. I recently went through some involved discussions with a client who has traditionally not used opensource software when a library package licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl seemed to be the best choice for our needs. Gpl, lesser general public license lgpl, mozilla public license mpl, etc. The lgpl is a copyleft open source software license that is less restrictive than the gpl gnu general public license what does this mean for you. The thing is, pyside2 is for using the qt framework with python programs. Or you can include a copy of the library binaries and its source with your application. Sony mobile offers to provide source code of software licensed under the gpl or lgpl or some other open source licenses allowing source code distribution to you on a cdrom for a charge covering. Recipients may distribute and modify the software but must track changesdates in the source files. It must be linked dynamically, not statically as the user must keep the ability to update the library independently from the program. See this page for clarification on the different kinds of licenses.
Since you have access to the codes through open source software, you are permitted to make changes, improve it, and create your own twist to it. Thats what the original lgpl was intended for, so that you could use an fsf library as a developer without having your entire bundle of software be required to follow gpl merely because you statically linked to the library and in embedded systems you are often required to statically link. See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work the gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. Each version is given a distinguishing version number. The most important difference between gpl and lgpl is that if your software uses teem, you are in no way required to release the source for your software. Fsf assimilates static linking to producing derivatives which may not be the case under eu. What exactly do i need to do if i use a lgpl licensed library. Originally written by richard stallman of the free software foundation in 1989, the gpl is now in its third iteration with the gplv3.
Jan, 2016 additionally, if the lgpld library is statically rather than dynamically linked with the other software, the developer must also provide the linkable object code version of the other software or alternatively, the source code of the other software. If you modify the software, you still have to give back the source code, but you are allowed to link it with proprietary stuff without giving the source code to all of that back. It coexists in that environment along with a broad spectrum of other development and distribution methods, including public domain software, freeware, shareware, proprietary commercial software and even. Or you can ship the object files so the user can link it to a different version to make a new staticallylinked version. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library. Differences between gpl and lgpl when using licensed software. In this case the other requirements are the same as if it was dynamically linked. You may copy, distribute and modify the software provided that modifications are described and licensed for free under lgpl. The lgpl is similar to the gpl, but is more designed for software libraries where you want to allow nongpl applications to link to your library and utilize it. If you are dynamically linking against a library, for example, this is fairly simple, because the recipient of your software need only modify the library to which your application is linked at startup. Its common for programs to call some functions which will be statically linked standard library functions like printf are usually statically linked and other functions which are dynamically linked. Is there a difference between licensing a library under. As a specialist in internet security and pioneer in the field of virus protection, the company, founded in bochum in 1985, developed.
957 8 646 967 245 1432 618 945 122 1234 1229 1095 1036 1144 207 1187 42 637 1077 524 702 1249 696 1142 1189 696 1140 1230 1422 11 1180 1141 1349 1141 426 703 944 56 1368